Chicago Sun-Times; March 25, 2001
Abortion Movement Reveals Its True Colors
by Betsy Hart
The right-to-life movement seems to be the most vilified movement in
our popular culture today. But over and over again I'm struck by the
thing: The cause of the pro-life activists is profoundly unique: There
no personal gain for those involved. The concern is for others, including
those who cannot speak or care for themselves.
Nowhere is this contrast in motivation greater than between the
pro-life movement and its pro-choice counterpart. The differences in
motivation may say just as much about the two as the differences in
policy debate involved.
The pro-life community consistently demonstrates its love for both the
unborn and their moms, which is why there are some 3,000 crisis pregnancy
centers in the United States, not one of which takes a dime from the
they help with their unexpected pregnancies.
These centers provide whatever help they can, including emotional
support like helping tell families, boyfriends or husbands about the
pregnancy (even, as is often the case, with counseling after an abortion).
Their help can include medical expenses, clothing, adoption services
that's a choice, often even jobs and housing. Anything the expectant
mother needs to truly have a choice about her own and her baby's future.
This costs a lot of money, and it's privately raised from loving
supporters who want to help women and their unborn children.
In contrast, almost 1.4 million abortions are performed in the United
States each year, for which an average fee of around $300 is routinely
charged the "customer." Often, that customer is the government.
California and New York, Medicaid pays for up to half of all abortions,
while they don't pay for the services of crisis pregnancy centers. This
surely gives poor women a one-sided incentive toward the "choice"
abortion. In any case, the high volume and quick turnover ensures a
profitable business, the name of the game for the abortion industry.
can't help but wonder: If abortion activists really care about the women
involved, why don't they volunteer services and facilities to all of
as the pro-life folks do_ Why not at least "help" the poorest
instead of demanding that taxpayers fund their abortions_
The answer speaks volumes about their motives.
So does the abortion activists' campaign of disinformation. Nowhere
this revealed more than in the debate over partial-birth abortion, the
gruesome procedure in which a very likely viable infant is delivered
first, but its skull crushed and brain removed before it technically
enters the world. Leaders in the abortion- rights movement, rightly
that Americans would recoil from all abortion when they found out about
the horrific act, variously told us that the procedure is rarely
performed; the baby feels nothing, because it is killed by the anesthesia
delivered to the mother, and it is done only when medically necessary.
The executive director of the National Abortion Federation finally
debunked the first myth, and the American College of Anesthesiologists
quickly corrected the second. When it came to the third, the generally
pro-choice American Medical Association said simply that the procedure
never medically necessary."
To me the most hideous contrast between the movements is when it comes
to the issue of rights. Fighting for the legitimate rights of oneself
others is a noble act. But while the pro-life activists fight for the
lives and rights of both mother and child, the abortion activists fight
for a perversion of rights in claiming that one innocent life must die
Sure, there may well be pro-life activists pursuing some selfish end.
There are a few who call themselves part of the movement but aren't
all, in that they would even take the life of another to pursue their
purposes. (They are routinely and roundly condemned by the legitimate
pro-life movement.) Conversely, there may be good- hearted pro-choice
activists who really, but wrongly, believe they are helping women.
Still, I see the heart of each movement consistently revealed in its
work. And it's clear to me that the pro-life movement as a whole is
selfless, caring only about life and others, while the abortion- rights
movement cares only about self. So I guess it's little wonder, really,
that today elite culture denigrates the former while it champions the